Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Saga
advertisement
Donald Trump’s stance on birthright citizenship has been a controversial and recurring theme throughout his political career. Birthright citizenship, protected under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, grants automatic citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of the legal status of their parents. Trump has repeatedly questioned and challenged this principle, particularly in the context of illegal immigration
During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump made headlines by proposing to end birthright citizenship. He argued that the current system encourages “anchor babies” — a term he used to describe children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, who then use the child's citizenship to gain legal status themselves. His stance was part of a broader hardline immigration agenda that resonated with many of his supporters but alarmed legal scholars and immigrant communities.
In 2018, while president, Trump reignited the debate when he claimed in an interview that he could end birthright citizenship through an executive order. “It’s in the process. It will happen,” he stated. This sparked immediate backlash, with many experts pointing out that such a change would require a constitutional amendment — not just an executive action. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, clearly states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States... are citizens of the United States.”
Legal analysts and even some conservatives criticized Trump’s plan as unconstitutional. Despite the threats and media attention, no executive order was issued during his presidency to eliminate birthright citizenship. The proposal was widely viewed as a political move aimed at energizing his base ahead of the midterm elections.
However, Trump has not abandoned the idea. As part of his 2024 presidential campaign, he once again vowed to end birthright citizenship if re-elected, repeating claims that the policy is being abused by migrants. He suggested signing an executive order on his first day back in office. While such promises continue to stir political debate, they remain legally dubious and unlikely to succeed without major constitutional changes.
Trump’s birthright citizenship saga is emblematic of his broader immigration rhetoric — bold, polarizing, and often legally challenged. While it appeals to certain voters, it raises fundamental questions about constitutional rights and the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary.
advertisement
Watch Video Below